{"tag":"twierdzenie","articles":{"blog\/mythology\/argumentum-ad-shakespear":{"key":"blog\/mythology\/argumentum-ad-shakespear","type":"article","published":true,"meta":{"createdAt":"2017-05-23T08:53:48+02:00","publishedAt":"2017-05-23T08:53:00+02:00","group":null,"category":"blog","subcategory":"mythology","slug":"argumentum-ad-shakespear"},"content":{"en":{"slug":"argumentum-ad-shakespear","title":"Argumentum ad Shakespear","intro":"\u003Cblockquote class=\u0022blockquote ml-4 pl-4 border-left\u0022\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EYou cannot say that water has no memory \/ god does not exist \/ horoscopes are rubbish \/ whatever just like that... Remember what Shakespear said: \u201cThere are more things in heaven and earth, than are dreamt of in your philosophy\u201d!\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EWell, I can. I so can. Because this argument is invalid...\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Csvg xmlns=\u0022http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\u0022 style=\u0022display: none;\u0022\u003E\u003C\/svg\u003E","content":"\u003Cblockquote class=\u0022blockquote ml-4 pl-4 border-left\u0022\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EYou cannot say that water has no memory \/ god does not exist \/ horoscopes are rubbish \/ whatever just like that... Remember what Shakespear said: \u201cThere are more things in heaven and earth, than are dreamt of in your philosophy\u201d!\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EWell, I can. I so can. Because this argument is invalid...\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EI\u2019m not saying Shakespear was wrong there. In his time it certainly nobody dreamt of quantum physics or black holes \u2013 and yet, they are there. But the problem appears when somebody tries to use this (or similar) quote not to broaden someone\u2019s horizons, but to \u201cprove\u201d some nonsense.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EHow do you best say, why such \u201cproof\u201d sucks? With the fact that it might theoretically \u201cprove\u201d \u003Cem\u003Eanything\u003C\/em\u003E.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EHere you go: the king of Cambodia keeps six hundred clones of Mother Theresa in his dungeons and makes them take care of poor orphans, all in order to take over for himself all the good karma that the clones produce. Sounds totally absurd, doesn\u2019t it? It should, since I just came up with that, without any premise. But hey, \u201cthere are more things than are dreamt\u201d, so open your damn mind!\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u201cProof\u201d, that can confirm literally \u003Cem\u003Eeverything\u003C\/em\u003E (including contradictory statements) is total crap. Please, don\u2019t use it.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Csvg xmlns=\u0022http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\u0022 style=\u0022display: none;\u0022\u003E\u003C\/svg\u003E","tags":["argument","bullshit","evidence","philosophy","proof"],"hasMore":true,"image":null,"introLite":"\u003Cblockquote\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EYou cannot say that water has no memory \/ god does not exist \/ horoscopes are rubbish \/ whatever just like that... Remember what Shakespear said: \u201cThere are more things in heaven and earth, than are dreamt of in your philosophy\u201d!\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EWell, I can. I so can. Because this argument is invalid...\u003C\/p\u003E","contentLite":"\u003Cblockquote\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EYou cannot say that water has no memory \/ god does not exist \/ horoscopes are rubbish \/ whatever just like that... Remember what Shakespear said: \u201cThere are more things in heaven and earth, than are dreamt of in your philosophy\u201d!\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EWell, I can. I so can. Because this argument is invalid...\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EI\u2019m not saying Shakespear was wrong there. In his time it certainly nobody dreamt of quantum physics or black holes \u2013 and yet, they are there. But the problem appears when somebody tries to use this (or similar) quote not to broaden someone\u2019s horizons, but to \u201cprove\u201d some nonsense.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EHow do you best say, why such \u201cproof\u201d sucks? With the fact that it might theoretically \u201cprove\u201d \u003Cem\u003Eanything\u003C\/em\u003E.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EHere you go: the king of Cambodia keeps six hundred clones of Mother Theresa in his dungeons and makes them take care of poor orphans, all in order to take over for himself all the good karma that the clones produce. Sounds totally absurd, doesn\u2019t it? It should, since I just came up with that, without any premise. But hey, \u201cthere are more things than are dreamt\u201d, so open your damn mind!\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u201cProof\u201d, that can confirm literally \u003Cem\u003Eeverything\u003C\/em\u003E (including contradictory statements) is total crap. Please, don\u2019t use it.\u003C\/p\u003E","words":207,"readTime":null,"lang":"en"},"pl":{"slug":"dowodzenie-z-szekspira","title":"Dowodzenie z Szekspira","intro":"\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cblockquote class=\u0022blockquote ml-4 pl-4 border-left\u0022\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ENie mo\u017cesz tak od razu m\u00f3wi\u0107, \u017ce woda nie ma pami\u0119ci \/ bozia nie istnieje \/ horoskopy s\u0105 z dupy wzi\u0119te \/ whatever... Bo w ko\u0144cu Shakespear powiedzia\u0142, \u017ce \u201cs\u0105 rzeczy na niebie i na ziemi, o kt\u00f3rych si\u0119 filozofom nie \u015bni\u0142o\u201d!\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ENie no, mog\u0119. Jak najbardziej mog\u0119. To ten argument jest inwalid\u0105...\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Csvg xmlns=\u0022http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\u0022 style=\u0022display: none;\u0022\u003E\u003C\/svg\u003E","content":"\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cblockquote class=\u0022blockquote ml-4 pl-4 border-left\u0022\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ENie mo\u017cesz tak od razu m\u00f3wi\u0107, \u017ce woda nie ma pami\u0119ci \/ bozia nie istnieje \/ horoskopy s\u0105 z dupy wzi\u0119te \/ whatever... Bo w ko\u0144cu Shakespear powiedzia\u0142, \u017ce \u201cs\u0105 rzeczy na niebie i na ziemi, o kt\u00f3rych si\u0119 filozofom nie \u015bni\u0142o\u201d!\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ENie no, mog\u0119. Jak najbardziej mog\u0119. To ten argument jest inwalid\u0105...\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ENie m\u00f3wi\u0119, \u017ce Shakespear nie mia\u0142 tam racji. Za jego czas\u00f3w na pewno nikomu nie \u015bni\u0142a si\u0119 taka fizyka kwantowa albo czarne dziury \u2013 a tu prosz\u0119, s\u0105. Problem pojawia si\u0119 dopiero wtedy, gdy kto\u015b pr\u00f3buje u\u017cywa\u0107 tego (lub podobnego) cytatu, nie po to, by otworzy\u0107 komu\u015b horyzonty na nieznane, lecz by \u201cudowodni\u0107\u201d jak\u0105\u015b bzdur\u0119.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EPo czym najlepiej wida\u0107, dlaczego taki \u201cdow\u00f3d\u201d ssie? Po tym, \u017ce teoretycznie mo\u017cna by nim \u201cudowodni\u0107\u201d \u003Cem\u003Ecokolwiek\u003C\/em\u003E.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EProsz\u0119 bardzo: kr\u00f3l Kambod\u017cy trzyma w lochach sze\u015b\u0107set klon\u00f3w Matki Teresy i ka\u017ce im si\u0119 zajmowa\u0107 tam sierotami, a to wszystko po to, by m\u00f3g\u0142 przej\u0105\u0107 dla siebie dobr\u0105 karm\u0119, kt\u00f3r\u0105 te klony wyprodukuj\u0105. Brzmi totalnie absurdalnie? Powinno, w\u0142a\u015bnie to wymy\u015bli\u0142em, bez absolutnie \u017cadnej przes\u0142anki sugeruj\u0105cej, \u017ce to mo\u017ce by\u0107 prawda. Ale w ko\u0144cu \u201cs\u0105 rzeczy, o kt\u00f3rych si\u0119 nie \u015bni\u0142o\u201d, wi\u0119c otw\u00f3rz sw\u00f3j umys\u0142!\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u201cDow\u00f3d\u201d, kt\u00f3ry potrafi potwierdzi\u0107 dos\u0142ownie \u003Cem\u003Ewszystko\u003C\/em\u003E (w tym twierdzenia wzajemnie sprzeczne) jest zupe\u0142nie do dupy. Prosz\u0119, nie u\u017cywaj go.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003Csvg xmlns=\u0022http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\u0022 style=\u0022display: none;\u0022\u003E\u003C\/svg\u003E","tags":["argument","bzdura","dow\u00f3d","filozofia","twierdzenie"],"hasMore":true,"image":null,"introLite":"\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cblockquote\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ENie mo\u017cesz tak od razu m\u00f3wi\u0107, \u017ce woda nie ma pami\u0119ci \/ bozia nie istnieje \/ horoskopy s\u0105 z dupy wzi\u0119te \/ whatever... Bo w ko\u0144cu Shakespear powiedzia\u0142, \u017ce \u201cs\u0105 rzeczy na niebie i na ziemi, o kt\u00f3rych si\u0119 filozofom nie \u015bni\u0142o\u201d!\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ENie no, mog\u0119. Jak najbardziej mog\u0119. To ten argument jest inwalid\u0105...\u003C\/p\u003E","contentLite":"\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cblockquote\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ENie mo\u017cesz tak od razu m\u00f3wi\u0107, \u017ce woda nie ma pami\u0119ci \/ bozia nie istnieje \/ horoskopy s\u0105 z dupy wzi\u0119te \/ whatever... Bo w ko\u0144cu Shakespear powiedzia\u0142, \u017ce \u201cs\u0105 rzeczy na niebie i na ziemi, o kt\u00f3rych si\u0119 filozofom nie \u015bni\u0142o\u201d!\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ENie no, mog\u0119. Jak najbardziej mog\u0119. To ten argument jest inwalid\u0105...\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003ENie m\u00f3wi\u0119, \u017ce Shakespear nie mia\u0142 tam racji. Za jego czas\u00f3w na pewno nikomu nie \u015bni\u0142a si\u0119 taka fizyka kwantowa albo czarne dziury \u2013 a tu prosz\u0119, s\u0105. Problem pojawia si\u0119 dopiero wtedy, gdy kto\u015b pr\u00f3buje u\u017cywa\u0107 tego (lub podobnego) cytatu, nie po to, by otworzy\u0107 komu\u015b horyzonty na nieznane, lecz by \u201cudowodni\u0107\u201d jak\u0105\u015b bzdur\u0119.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EPo czym najlepiej wida\u0107, dlaczego taki \u201cdow\u00f3d\u201d ssie? Po tym, \u017ce teoretycznie mo\u017cna by nim \u201cudowodni\u0107\u201d \u003Cem\u003Ecokolwiek\u003C\/em\u003E.\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003EProsz\u0119 bardzo: kr\u00f3l Kambod\u017cy trzyma w lochach sze\u015b\u0107set klon\u00f3w Matki Teresy i ka\u017ce im si\u0119 zajmowa\u0107 tam sierotami, a to wszystko po to, by m\u00f3g\u0142 przej\u0105\u0107 dla siebie dobr\u0105 karm\u0119, kt\u00f3r\u0105 te klony wyprodukuj\u0105. Brzmi totalnie absurdalnie? Powinno, w\u0142a\u015bnie to wymy\u015bli\u0142em, bez absolutnie \u017cadnej przes\u0142anki sugeruj\u0105cej, \u017ce to mo\u017ce by\u0107 prawda. Ale w ko\u0144cu \u201cs\u0105 rzeczy, o kt\u00f3rych si\u0119 nie \u015bni\u0142o\u201d, wi\u0119c otw\u00f3rz sw\u00f3j umys\u0142!\u003C\/p\u003E\n\u003Cp\u003E\u201cDow\u00f3d\u201d, kt\u00f3ry potrafi potwierdzi\u0107 dos\u0142ownie \u003Cem\u003Ewszystko\u003C\/em\u003E (w tym twierdzenia wzajemnie sprzeczne) jest zupe\u0142nie do dupy. Prosz\u0119, nie u\u017cywaj go.\u003C\/p\u003E","words":244,"readTime":null,"lang":"pl"}}}}}